New side effect discovered in controversial fracking practice

New side effect discovered in controversial fracking practice

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, isn’t without notoriety. The practice is riddled with objections and complaints from those affected. Communities near wells experience chemical exposures and contaminated water supplies, among other risks. Amidst all the negative publicity, a new threat emerged following a study by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

During a study conducted last spring and summer, NIOSH researchers monitored the amount of benzene released during one of the stages of fracking called flowback. Around a month after the water cocktail is pumped into the ground to release the natural gas, the fluids return to the top of the wells. This flowback contains waste water, sand, fracking fluid, gas and oil.  From here, the liquids are separated and tested by well workers.

To measure the flowback, workers open the top hatches on the wells and insert a gauging stick into the tanks. When they’re too deep, a hand-cranked gauging tape is used.

Almost 90 percent of the samples contained levels that were over the legal limit for workers for exposure to benzene. Multiply this by the amount of times the worker is involved with this process and they have significantly higher chances of developing a benzene-related illness.

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), benzene can hinder how cells typically work and cause many problems with bone marrow, red blood cells and white blood cells. With the potential for leukemia to develop, both the short- and long-term effects can be deadly.

After evaluating the results, NIOSH released recommendations that reflect the dangers associated with flowback testing, including limiting worker exposure and the use of respiratory masks. While the conclusions are preliminary, the agency believes in making changes now to make the process safer.

Because the oil and gas industry is rapidly growing and adjusting, the long-term effects on the workers and communities are not known. Studies like this are done to help prevent future issues with all those involved with or near fracking sites.

 

Footnotes
Arenschield, L. (2014). Fracking exposes workers to benzene. The Columbus Dispatch. [Link]
Banerjee, N. (2014). Fracking workers exposed to dangerous amounts of benzene, study says. Los Angeles Times. [Link]
CDC. (2013). Facts about benzene. Emergency Preparedness and Response. [Link]
0

Related Posts

Dynarex Baby Powder Recall:…

Dynarex Baby Powder Recall: Potential Asbestos Contamination Raises Alarms Dynarex Corporation recently announced a recall of its Dynacare baby powder due to potential asbestos contamination. The recall was triggered following…
Read more

The Importance of Raising…

The Importance of Raising Awareness – Mesothelioma Awareness Day 2024 Mesothelioma Awareness Day is observed annually on September 26, serving as a platform to educate the public about the dangers…
Read more

Northeastern PA Schools Receive…

Northeastern PA Schools Receive $4 Million in Grants for Asbestos and Lead Abatement Schools across Northeastern Pennsylvania are taking significant steps to safeguard the health and well-being of students and…
Read more

FREE CASE EVALUATION

No fee unless you receive compensation!

"*" indicates required fields

Hidden

Next Steps: Sync an Email Add-On

To get the most out of your form, we suggest that you sync this form with an email add-on. To learn more about your email add-on options, visit the following page (https://www.gravityforms.com/the-8-best-email-plugins-for-wordpress-in-2020/). Important: Delete this tip before you publish the form.
Address*
Please detail why you are contacting Goldberg, Persky, & White, P.C.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.